Current:Home > reviewsWest Virginia is asking the US Supreme Court to consider transgender surgery Medicaid coverage case -消息
West Virginia is asking the US Supreme Court to consider transgender surgery Medicaid coverage case
View
Date:2025-04-14 13:34:47
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — West Virginia is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review rulings that found the state’s refusal to cover certain health care for transgender people with government-sponsored insurance is discriminatory, Republican Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said Thursday.
In April, the Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 8-6 in the case involving coverage of gender-affirming surgery by West Virginia Medicaid, finding that the “coverage exclusions facially discriminate based on sex and gender identity,” according to a majority opinion penned by Judge Roger Gregory.
The state of West Virginia had argued that officials in states with limited resources should have discretion to utilize those resources as they see fit to meet the needs of the population. West Virginia is one of the U.S. states with the most people living under the poverty line and the worst health outcomes.
“We’re not a rich state — we can’t afford to do everything,” Morrisey said Thursday during a live-streamed briefing with press. “And that’s one of the challenges that we have with this mandate. There’s only so much money to go around, and spending money on some treatments necessarily takes it away from others.”
West Virginia is “a state that’s trying to help ensure that we’re covering people with heart disease, with diabetes, and all sorts of medical conditions,” Morrisey said, adding that long-term research on gender affirming surgery is still limited.
In the majority 4th Circuit opinion, judges said the cost of treatment is not a sufficient argument to support upholding a policy found to be discriminatory: “Especially where government budgets are involved, there will frequently be a ‘rational’ basis for discrimination,” Judge Gregory wrote.
During Thursday’s briefing, Morrisey said he didn’t have the data in front of him to answer a question from a reporter about how many West Virginia Medicaid recipients had pursued obtaining gender-affirming surgery, and what the actual cost to the state was.
“We can look at it and we can evaluate it, but that’s not the question in this case,” he said.
The 4th Circuit case also involved gender-affirming care coverage by North Carolina’s state employee health plan. Specifically, North Carolina’s policy bars treatment or studies “leading to or in connection with sex changes or modifications and related care,” while West Virginia’s bars coverage of “transsexual surgery.”
A spokesperson for Morrisey’s office said Thursday that North Carolina is also asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take up its case.
Similar cases are under consideration in courts across the country, but April’s was the first U.S. Court of Appeals decision to consider government-sponsored coverage exclusions of gender affirming medical care — and whether those exclusions are lawful.
Both states appealed separate lower court rulings that found the denial of gender-affirming care to be discriminatory and unconstitutional. Two panels of three Fourth Circuit judges heard arguments in both cases last year before deciding to intertwine the two cases and see them presented before the full court.
In August 2022, a federal judge ruled West Virginia’s Medicaid program must provide coverage for gender-affirming care for transgender residents.
An original lawsuit filed in 2020 also named state employee health plans. A settlement with The Health Plan of West Virginia Inc. in 2022 led to the removal of the exclusion on gender-affirming care in that company’s Public Employees Insurance Agency plans.
Unlike North Carolina, West Virginia has covered hormone therapy and other pharmaceutical treatments for transgender people since 2017. Gregory noted in April that West Virginia’s program partially or fully covers surgeries to remove and reconstruct sexual organs for non-gender dysphoria-related diagnoses, such as cancer.
How many people use this
“We can look at it and evaluate it, but that’s not the question we’re looking at here/// 19:30
veryGood! (1)
Related
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Climate Change Is Transforming the Great Barrier Reef, Likely Forever
- Today’s Climate: July 15, 2010
- Can a Climate Conscious Diet Include Meat or Dairy?
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- NASA mission to the sun answers questions about solar wind that causes aurora borealis
- Why did he suspect a COVID surge was coming? He followed the digital breadcrumbs
- Suburbs delivered recent wins for Georgia Democrats. This year, they're up for grabs
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- It cost $38,398 for a single shot of a very old cancer drug
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Today’s Climate: July 21, 2010
- After a patient died, Lori Gottlieb found unexpected empathy from a stranger
- Anti-Eminent Domain but Pro-Pipelines: A Republican Conundrum
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Cheap Federal Coal Supports Largest U.S. Producers
- Here Are All of the Shows That Have Been Impacted By the WGA Strike 2023
- Today’s Climate: Juy 17-18, 2010
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
A kind word meant everything to Carolyn Hax as her mom battled ALS
Annie Murphy Shares the Must-Haves She Can’t Live Without, Including an $8 Must-Have
Benefits of Investing in Climate Adaptation Far Outweigh Costs, Commission Says
Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
Today’s Climate: July 28, 2010
Bryan Miller, Phoenix man dubbed The Zombie Hunter, sentenced to death for 1990s murders of Angela Brosso and Melanie Bernas
Abortion is on the ballot in Montana. Voters will decide fate of the 'Born Alive' law